SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
 
 
distribution

Focus: RFID and Automated Identification and Data Collection (AIDC)

Feature Article from Our RFID and AIDC Subject Area - See All

 

From SCDigest's OnTarget e-Magazine

- July 7, 2015 -

 

RFID and AIDC News: Companies that Embrace Internet of Things Service Model will be the Winners, Harvard Business Blogger Says

 

Companies that See Only Cost and Complexity will Miss the Opportunity, IoT Expert Weichselbaum Says


SCDigest Editorial Staff


The Internet of Things (IoT) - or Internet of Everything, take your pick - is going to have profound implications in many areas of business, and no more so than how companies interact with their business and consumer customers over the long term.

So says Paul Weichselbaum, a technology industry executive and apparent expert on IoT, in a recent blog posting on the Harvard Business Review web site.

SCDigest Says:

start

There certain some elements of truth in Weichselbaum argument, but in the end, what will be the costs in this service model - and will users be willing to pay for it?.

close
What Do You Say?

 

Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

To date, most companies sell customers a product and hope to never hear from them again, Weichselbaum notes. If a customer needs support of any kind for that product after the sale, companies just say No if the product is past the warranty period, will push that customer to self-help on the web, make them endure voice system hell if they dare to place a phone call, rely largely on offshore support for those calls that make it through, etc.

"This service paradigm is not designed for a world in which intelligent, context-aware, learning devices are interacting with each other, with the Cloud and with our smartphones while other devices are constantly being added, removed, or modified (via downloads from the Cloud)," Weichselbaum writes. "This environment requires a focus on what the user is trying to do as opposed to merely whether the crockpot they purchased is operating as intended."

Until IoT, consumers typically purchases devices, such as say a garage door opener. That physical opener in effect operates in standalone mode and requires direct physical action - for example, pressing the door opener in a car when a consumer arrives home.

But that paradigm is changing now for some already and undoubtedly countless others before long. You will drive up to your house - which has adjusted heating or cooling in anticipation of your arrival - and the garage door will open automatically, the security system will disarm, the doors will unlock and the lights come on.

This, says Weichselbaum, is more like a service than a device - and "This impending future creates a conundrum for "thing makers" as the way that services must be supported is profoundly different from the way that devices are."

Some will consider this changing dynamic and see operational headaches and increased service costs, Weichselbaum says, while others - the companies that he believes will be the winners in the IoT - will see opportunity.


(RFID and AIDC Story Continued Below)

 

 
CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

 
 


Rather than continue dodging customers, they'll transform their service models operationally, technically, and culturally," Weichselbaum writes. "They'll embrace the opportunity by applying different KPIs - such as improved customer experience, churn reduction, and increased customer lifetime value — hiring more technically oriented (and nimble) service reps and modifying the service model from one in which the company defines problems it's willing to address to one in which the customers defines the job to be done, and the company helps them do it - indefinitely."

Weichselbaum believes we are in an era where experience is surpassing product and price as the number one brand differentiator.

"Therefore, focusing on the user, their environment and what they're trying to do with their technology, as opposed to how any given component in their envelope is functioning, is essential, even when that means supporting other companies' products," he further argues.

"The companies that see service in an IoT world as a competitive differentiator - a brand and growth opportunity - will thrive; those that continue to view service as an episodic cost obligation will lose out," Weichselbaum concludes.

SCDigest's view: There certain some elements of truth in Weichselbaum argument, but in the end, what will be the costs in this service model - and will users be willing to pay for it? There are many companies providing these kind of services using IoT and Cloud technology to business customers and charging for it - but that is because there is an ROI to business customers from the investment.

Consumers are a different category - there is still a sort of belief that anything on the Internet ought to be free. And while it might sound appealing in theory, the idea of company A providing support for problems with company B's product - we think that is likely a bridge too high for the foreseeable future.


Do you agree with Weichselbaum's views on how IoT will change consumer services? Will anyone be willing to pay for it? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback section below.

 

Recent Feedback

 

No Feedback on this article yet

 

 
 
   
.