| 
 I was at a small meeting of retail and consumer goods supply chain executives some 10 years ago when a VP  of supply chain from a manufacturer made an interesting comment.
 
 My memory is slightly faded, but it was  something very close to: “When we sit down a with retail customer, we can tell  in about the first 10-15 minutes whether the retailer team really is interested  in what I would call deep supply chain collaboration – or they are not.”
 
 So what type of collaboration partner are  you, whatever side of the table you are on (retailer, wholesaler, or vendor)?
 
                        
                          | 
                            
                              | Supply Chain Digest Says... |  
                              | 
                                
                                  |  |  
                                  | ...the relationship model can change over time – and it is important to be able to identify and react to those changes.
 |  
                                  |  |  |  |  
 
                        
 Visit the Retail Vendor Performance Management home page to learn more and subscribe to the monthly newsletter.
 
 That comment also made me think about the  ground breaking thinking of Dr. John Gattorna, starting with his book “Living Supply  Chains” in 2006, followed by updates in 2011 (“Dynamic Supply Chains”) and 2019  (“Transforming Supply Chains").
 
 Gattorna. of the Sydney Business School (Australia) and Cranfield School of  Management (UK), and an ex-Accenture consultant, makes a simple but powerful  point: far too many companies spend significant time, effort and dollars trying  to collaborate with trading partners that for a myriad of reasons really don’t  want to collaborate. Does that sound  familiar?
 
 Gattorna says that supply  chain collaboration is a waste if you continue to put effort and focus to  "entice" a customer or vendor to collaborate when they simply don’t  value the exercise. In addition, by doing so you suck attention and resources  away from those trading partners that do. Gattorna says you can (and  ultimately must) segment customers (and vendors) into four types, based on what  they truly value in the relationship. Those four meta-types are: 
 Continuous Replenishment: Characterized by predictable demand, these are generally the  ones that both want to and benefit from tight collaboration. High levels of  loyalty. 
 
 Lean: Mostly consistent demand, main focus is on efficiency and cost.
 
 Agile: Unpredictable demand, opportunistic, need for quick response to new needs.
 
 Fully Flexible: Very  unpredictable demand, customer looking for lots of customization in product  design, programs and services. Values innovation.
 
 Gattorna says that many  customers will have characteristics of two of these types, but that one will be  dominant. 
 
 That is obviously a  vendor/manufacturer perspective. From a retailer/wholesaler point of view, the  key is to identify which types of supply chain relationships you want to have  with what types or groups of vendors.
 
 While clearly there will be a  lot of focus on the Continuous Replenishment and Lean models, some  vendors/product categories may more appropriately fall under more Agile or  Fully Flexible collaboration models.
 
 This then leads to rethinking  how a vendor might segment retail or wholesale customers – and how a retailer  or wholesaler might segment its vendor base.
 
 Gattorna  advocates setting up separate supply chain teams focused on meeting each of  these types of relationships, each focused on the differentiated approaches,  relationships and services the segment requires.
 
 He also  believes that companies often simply optimize inventory, transportation and  service trade-offs against basically a universal customer or vendor type, and  as a result develop a single supply chain strategy when a more segmented  approach is what can deliver success.
 
 That said,  the relationship model can change over time – and it is important to be able to  identify and react to those changes. What’s more, the relationship type might vary  even within a given partner, depending on product category or some other  attribute.
 
 All this  clearly had vendor management implications - the metrics that are important for  say Continuous Replenishment vendors are likely to vary compared to what  matters in Agile relationships.
 
 This is  where vendor management software tools can really help, used to define, capture  and report on vendor performance specific to each segment type and metrics.
 
 I highly  recommend any of the three Gattorna books, available from all the usual  sources.ail_vendor_2020.htm.
 
 Any comment on this article? Enter below.
 
 Your Comments/Feedback |