SEARCH searchBY TOPIC
right_division Green SCM Distribution
Bookmark us
sitemap
SCDigest Logo
distribution

Focus: RFID and Automated Identification and Data Collection (AIDC)

Feature Article from Our RFID and AIDC Subject Area - See All

From SCDigest's OnTarget e-Magazine

- March 28 2012 -

 

Dr. Bill Hardgrave on Keys to Item-Level RFID Pilot Success

 

Stores Almost Always Overestimate their Current Levels of Inventory Accuracy, He Says; Getting to 70% Takes "Extraordinary Effort" without RFID

 

SCDigest Editorial Staff

 

After the collapse of the case-level RFID tagging initiative, as the Walmart program that was the locomotive to the industry's train ran out of fuel a few years ago, now like a Phoenix rising from the ashes RFID in the consumer goods to retail supply chain has enjoyed a resurgence in item level tagging in the soft goods sector.

SCDigest Says:

start

In fact,Hardgrave observed that without RFID, "it takes extraordinary effort" to get accuracy levels over 70%, and the highest he has ever seen is 80%.

close
What Do You Say?

 

Click Here to Send Us Your Comments
feedback
Click Here to See Reader Feedback

PWalmart itself has been a big part of the charge, actively rolling out RFID programs in several soft goods categories, and more recently looking to expand even to hard goods categories such as tires and some consumer electronics. JCPenney, Macy's, American Apparel, The Gap stores and others are either rolling out item-level RFID or actively piloting the technology in-store.

Soft goods such as apparel and shoes are especially attractive opportunities because for each SKU there are a number of colors and styles. That makes inventory management in-store especially challenging, which leads to lost sales as inventory counts get off and items aren't replenished, items are in the wrong location on the floor, and/or items that should be on the floor are in the backroom, among other issues.

RFID can be used to rapidly take cycle counts of store-level inventory at the item level, dramatically improving accuracy while reducing the time it takes to conduct the counts by many hours. These cycle counts can also identify when a product is in the wrong location, or in the back room when it should be on the shelf or floor.

Dr. Bill Hardgrave, now Dean of the business school at Auburn University, made a name for himself in the RFID industry in the latter half of the 2000s with some excellent research on RFID at the University of Arkansas's RFID center, where he did quite a bit of work in item-level RFID before moving to Auburn, where he continues research programs.

Hardgrave spoke last week at the VCF (Vendor Compliance Federation) Spring meeting in Orlando on 10 keys to item-level RFID pilot success.

Hardgrave noted that the real inventory management challenges, especially in apparel, are in the store, not the DC, and that this is probably where the industry needed to start, not at the case/pallet level as it did with the Walmart program.

He also noted that in his work with retailers, RFID data always shows "there is a lot of difference between what retail executives think is happening at the store versus what is really happening."

He said that using his definition that an accurate inventory count is one where the true on-hand inventory level exactly equals the count in the store's perpetual inventory system, most retailers have accuracy levels of only 50-60%.

He said he recently worked with one 600-store chain that thought it had accuracy levels of about 80%. It turned out to be 28%.

"Virtually all retailers overestimate their accuracy levels," Hardgrave said.

In fact, he observed that without RFID, "it takes extraordinary effort" to get accuracy levels over 70%, and the highest he has ever seen is 80%.

Hardgrave added that RFID can have a major impact on the "big four" retail in-store inventory challenges:


• Inventory accuracy
• Out-of-stocks
• Product location
• Loss prevention

 

He said that today, in reasonable quantities, RFID "inlays" - the basic tags themselves which can sometimes be used as is but in soft goods are more likely to be embedded in a paper tag or label construction - can be had for about 6 cents apiece. While at that level ROI for items level programs can often be easily justified for soft goods and other more expensive items, it isn't going to work for a can of soup.

(RFID and AIDC Story Continued Below)


CATEGORY SPONSOR: SOFTEON

 

 

However, Hardgrave said that within 3-5 years, new "printable" tags may emerge (there is much active work of printable electronics right now) that would make them practically free, as the printed bar code is today. The tags might use the metal in a can as the antenna, so that item level tagging could move to many more product categories than could be cost-justified today.

Keys to RFID Pilot Success

Among the 10 keys identified by Hardgrave, some stood out. Those include:


• As indicated above, store-level RFID projects have to start with inventory accuracy. "Nothing else matters if inventory accuracy in store is poor," Hardgrave said. The point was the team and executives need to have this firmly grounded efore any real effort begins.


RFID can easily get accuracy levels even under his strict definition to over 90%, Hardgrave said.

• Don't get bogged down in spending too much time testing to see if the technology works, Hardgrave said. "It works," he stated, saying that 5-6 years ago such basic technology tests were probably needed, but not anymore. Spending a lot of time there will just needless slow efforts down, he noted, saying he is aware of a retailer that is getting reads rates in store of about 1000 per minute.

• It is important to well think through your pilot strategy. For example, is it going to be just a few items/categories across several stores, or more items in a single stores? He also suggested that tagging related categories often make sense, so that the data isn't confounded by links between the two. Regardless, it is essential to use similar control stores for any RFID pilots, so that real improvements in performance specific to RFID can be measured.

• Also with regard to pilots, he said usually there will have to be in-store "tagging parties," because even if the plan is for vendor tagging for the pilot, it will usually take months for that inventory to cycle through, too long of a delay to be practical. He said companies usually use mobile printers on the store floor to get the tagging done. Many have their tagging parties in overnight hours. If the chain itself is going to do the tagging rather than the vendors, it is usually much more effective to do it at the DC than in-store, he said, after the tagging party is finished for current stock.

Hardgrave also later told SCDigest that the idea of combining electronic article surveillance (EAS) with RFID in a single tag probably really doesn't make sense. "Just use the RFID tag for both," he said.

Do you agree with Hardgrave's thoughts on the industry now and the approach to retail item-level RFID pilots? What would you add? Let us know your thoughts at the Feedback section below.


Recent Feedback

Thanks for covering the growing RFID effort.  To clarify the last statement about EAS and RFID: I believe that "in the long run" it probably doesn't make sense to combine EAS and RFID.  In the near term, for those already using EAS, dual purpose (EAS/RFID) portals and tags may help companies make the transition from a legacy (EAS) technology to the new technology (RFID). RFID can provide the same functionality as EAS (i.e., as a loss detector), and much more -- e.g., inventory management,  For companies currently not using EAS, they should consider adopting RFID as an inventory management tool and a loss prevention device (among other uses).


Bill Hardgrave
Dean, College of Business
Auburn University
Mar, 29 2012
 
.