|
|
Other Responses |
|
I agree with the response stated above. To me, anytime labor is required to move product from one place to another, i.e., truck to dock, truck to storage, etc., - it should be counted as a touch and the activity should be measured.
Mike Nardella
VP, Distribution
Pinnacle Foods Group LLC
|
|
|
I would agree with Jim Tompkins wholeheartedly...my experience is that most receiving processes involve multiple touches as Jim has outlined. In fact, at the CSCMP conference this week, the presentation from Carl Zeiss' Lean project team outlined some key metrics in terms of 'average days' to receive certain products due to inbound inspection and repackaging - all very important, but expensive touches. Inbound VAS is critical to many operations and must be counted, measured and costed-out in terms of total warehouse operations.
Steve Simmerman
Partner, Next View Software, Inc.
|
|
|
The real question is how many times do you touch the product in the receiving process, not that receiving is a touch. Do you have to sort and segretate the material? That is a touch. "Oh no, the delivery driver has to do that." Sorry, that is still a touch, and you sill pay for it in the freight charges. Do you have to open a box and scan the UPC to make sure it is in your system? There is another touch. Jim, Mike and Steve are all right, there are many touches in the receiving process. The question becomes, really how much value does any of those touches add to the goods? Answer - No Value.
David Schneider
President
David K Schneider & Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|